Blog category
Calculating material damage, bank losses, credit fraud and asset stripping.
Quantifying damages is the part of a case where the price of an error is measured directly in the amount claimed — or in the civil claim inside criminal proceedings. The forensic expert determines the documented amount of material damage: actual losses and, where the evidence supports it, lost profit (Articles 22 and 623 of the Civil Code).
The other half of this section is financial and credit transactions, specialism 11.3. Here the study covers the correctness of interest, fees and penalty charges under a credit agreement, the outstanding balance on a given date, the targeted use of credit funds and the adequacy of security. Such questions arise in disputes with banks, in cases of fraud with financial resources, and in proceedings on asset stripping and driving a company into insolvency.
The study requires contracts with all annexes, the credit agreement and repayment schedule, pledge and surety agreements, account statements, memorial orders, the bank's own calculation, acceptance acts, costings and estimates, and records of the movement of goods and money. The expert produces the figure — but does not identify culpable persons or decide whether conduct amounts to an offence.
Which documents a forensic expert in Ukraine needs to examine financial-credit operations: loan agreement, bank statements, certified copies.
How expertise proves the causal link between management action and a bank's insolvency in Ukraine and quantifies creditor loss under Art. 218-1.
How a forensic expert in Ukraine assesses sham deals and fictitious counterparties: signs of unreality, documents and the limits of an opinion.
How economic expertise traces the movement of funds and exposes laundering schemes in Ukraine: methods, key documents and the expert's limits.
How a forensic economist calculates material damage and loss for a Ukrainian court: legal basis, data sources, valuation date and common errors.
Expert review under Art. 222 of Ukraine's Criminal Code: what an expert proves about false data given to a bank, and how it differs from Art. 190.
How to calculate lost profit and prove it in a Ukrainian court: the legal basis, accepted methods, supporting documents and common mistakes.
A Ukrainian forensic economist on the signs of corporate asset stripping, the proceedings it surfaces in and the methods that prove it in court.
A bank's real loss on an unpaid loan is rarely the sum claimed. A forensic economist in Ukraine on how that figure is actually built and verified.
How a Ukrainian forensic economist proves a shortfall under Art. 191 of the Criminal Code: stocktaking rules, primary records, common errors.
Yes, where there is a documentary basis. Lost profit is income the party could realistically have earned in the ordinary course, so contracts, prior performance figures and evidence of readiness to perform are required. A calculation resting only on expectations or a business plan is rarely accepted by a court.
The credit agreement with all amendments and the repayment schedule, statements on the loan account, memorial orders, the bank's own debt calculation, security agreements and the collateral valuation documents. From these the expert verifies the interest and penalties charged and establishes the balance outstanding on a specific date.
No. The expert determines the size of the loss and whether it is documented; involvement of a particular person and questions of fault are for the court. The question should therefore read “what is the amount of loss caused by the transactions described”, not “did the director cause the loss”.
In civil and commercial disputes damages consist of actual losses plus lost profit. In criminal proceedings the amount of material harm is usually confined to documented direct losses and affects both the qualification of the offence and the scope of the civil claim. The methods differ, and that should be reflected in how the question is framed.