Skip to content
← All blog topics

Blog category

Tax disputes & audits

Challenging tax assessments, counterparty fictitiousness and the role of examination in disputes with the tax service.

A dispute with the tax authorities begins with an audit report and ends with a figure in a tax notice-decision. Between those two points there are at least three moments where an economic calculation changes the outcome: objections to the report, administrative appeal to a higher-level authority (Article 56 of the Tax Code) and a claim before the administrative court.

The taxpayer's key procedural advantage is Article 77(2) of the Code of Administrative Procedure: the duty to prove the lawfulness of a decision rests on the public authority. If an expert study shows that the authority's calculation is not supported by documents or contains methodological errors, the burden of proving otherwise stays with the tax service. An error in the base calculation also carries the penalty and late-payment interest with it, since both are derived from the assessed amount.

The most common battlegrounds are overstated input VAT and “unreal” transactions with a counterparty, unconfirmed expenses for corporate income tax, allegations of business splitting through private entrepreneurs, and blocked tax invoices. This section covers the types of audit and their grounds, how to draft objections to an audit report, which questions to put to an expert in a tax dispute, and where the line runs between an administrative dispute and criminal proceedings under Article 212 of the Criminal Code.

Articles in this category

Frequently asked questions

Can an expert conclusion cancel a tax notice-decision?

No — only the court can annul it. An expert conclusion is evidence, weighed by the court together with the rest of the file. It is, however, usually the only source that shows the court exactly where the authority's calculation fails arithmetically and methodologically.

Is it better to commission an examination before or during the case?

A pre-trial study often becomes the foundation of the claim: it shows which figures are wrong and why, and lets the relief be framed properly. If a sharp dispute over methodology remains, the court may order an examination by its own ruling. The two routes do not compete — they complement each other.

Who has to prove that an assessment is lawful?

The tax authority. Article 77(2) of the Code of Administrative Procedure places the burden of proving the lawfulness of a decision on the public authority. The taxpayer need not prove innocence, but must produce the documents that support the figures in its reporting, as Article 44 of the Tax Code requires.

Does an examination help when tax invoices are blocked?

Unblocking is primarily an administrative procedure: filing explanations and copies of documents with the regional commission and, if refused, appealing. An economic analysis helps by documenting the resources available and the reality of the transaction behind the invoice.

Privacy policy